POSTED RESPONSE TO AN EDITORIAL IN TORONTO'S GLOBE AND MAIL
It has long been only a matter of time until an effective anti-carrier missile is developed.
The Chinese - with their intellectual gift for mathematics, engineering, and computers now financed by a successful economy - have long been good candidates for coming up with it.
After all, they have already, in a short space of time, come up with a working satellite-killer and an advanced thermonuclear warhead comparable to the American W-88.
And, not very long ago, during some American naval exercises in the Southwest seas, a brilliant Chinese submarine commander managed to surface his boat right in the middle of America's ships, America's hugely expensive and complex electro-magnetic "umbrella" having failed to detect his boat.
The American Navy was hugely embarrassed and rather shaken by this feat, the result of a new coating and other technologies for Chinese submarines.
I think these events remarkable for a country which spends about 15% of what America spends every year on its military.
There is nothing unsettling about it.
Indeed, I think but am not sure the Russian "sunburn" missile, which spirals unpredictably as it homes in at supersonic speeds, may be capable of sinking a capital ship despite its radar-guided Gatling-gun defenses.
The United States for too long has arrogantly roamed the world's seas with its aircraft carriers, busy intimidating others, carrying on pointless wars and interventions.
A world of multiple powers will be a much healthier one.
In the way international affairs work, having a single unstoppable super-power is just as unhealthy as having a tyrant running a country.
America itself has suffered seriously in its democratic values and human rights from the decaying effects of its monstrous military-industrial complex.
Remember, America spends more on its military than all other nations on earth combined, and it has done so for a long time.
Remember, that since WWII, America has launched an almost continuous series of ugly wars and invasions and interventions, almost all of them pointless and none of them serving the interests of democracy and human rights. Three million dead in Vietnam, a million dead in Cambodia (destabilized by American intervention), a million dead in Iraq, plus countless lesser savage tolls.
And remember, too, that America is the world's largest arms merchant, spreading death for profit across the face of the planet.
And, last, remember what Lord Acton said about absolute power.
Meanwhile, despite the fears constantly stirred up by our press and the American government, China has kept to its own sphere and it has not started any wars.
A link to a reprinted chapter of my book of three years ago may be of interest.
See "China's New Weapons" at:
China's new DF21-D anti-ship missile is a ballistic missile, as opposed to Sunburn which is a ramjet cruise missile which travels about 3 times the speed of sound. The DF21-D is launched much like an ICBM to arch over a region of sea. Its sensors detect enemy ships, and the warhead's course is altered as needed from its ballistic arch to rain down on a target at hypersonic speeds, the kinetic energy alone of such a strike being adequate to disable a capital ship. This missile is being installed along the coast of China opposite Taiwan to put American carriers at serious risk should they be used to defend Taiwan. The combination of these two anti-ship missiles may well render aircraft carriers obsolete in parts of the world.