COMMENT POSTED TO AN ARTICLE IN RUSSIA INSIDER
“New Book About the Deep State Plot to Demonize Russia
With a strong endorsement from Oliver Stone The Plot to Scapegoat Russia”
I am always glad for new sources which confirm old beliefs, but, I must say, there is little in this review that is new to informed and critically-minded observers.
Concepts such as “humanitarian intervention” are, and have long been, of the same nature as the White Helmets in Syria, totally phony.
The US never intervenes militarily where genuine humanitarian catastrophes occur. It did not intervene in Rwanda while it understood perfectly what was happening at a very early stage. It did not in Cambodia. It did not in Indonesia.
Indeed, in the slaughters of Indonesia, after the fall of Sukarno, the State Department was on the phone submitting lists of "communists" to the new government who were best added to the hundreds of thousands getting their throats cut and having their bodies thrown into rivers.
The US militarily intervenes only where it has a geo-political goal or interest.
As far as phony front outfits like America’s Democracy Now! there are many of them in the US.
Despite formal rules against being involved in local affairs, the CIA has long used the method of such media to "get out its messages." In the 1960s, good magazines like Saturday Review were secretly supported by CIA.
What do formal rules mean to an organization where it is accepted that lying under oath is just fine? CIA Director Helms himself established that fact for us back in the 1960s.
The Internet has many seemingly liberal or independent sites which I believe are in fact CIA zombies. In some cases, they may know it. In other cases, they may not. The CIA works both ways, just as it has paid its own employees and paid outside assets, the assets not always being aware of where their money comes from.
You can take a good guess at such sites just by the nature of the material they favor, the way they treat things, and the rules they establish.
Mother Jones magazine seems certainly one of these. Daily Kos is another. Pacific News Network is yet another. Vanity Fair belongs on the list I believe.
The American book publishing industry is filled with the same effort. Some publishing houses go along to get along, some are unwitting tools, and some are themselves just covert operations.
Remember, publishing in a country like the United States is today a very difficult business, fraught with risk. How nice to have a source of funds, whether understood or not, streaming in to steady your business.
In return, as a publisher, you still get to do some of what you always wanted to do, but perhaps not all of it, but there are a few things, here and there, that you must do or you will lose your important covert sponsor.
There has been an entire industry in advocacy books about such crucial matters as the Kennedy Assassination, the downing of TWA Flight 800, and 9/11. The manipulative nature of a good many of the books is apparent. This CIA effort, by the way, plays the game from both sides.
Books trying to reestablish the authority of the pathetic Warren Report by one route or another - authors like Gerald Posner, Priscilla Johnson, Vincent Bugliosi, Edward Epstein - clearly have CIA influence embedded one way or another into their books on the Kennedy Assassination, directly or indirectly. You cannot read their books without sensing it at many little points, as in what things are emphasized and what things are glossed over or as in over-hyped claims about the limited evidence we have.
The Agency also takes another route of attack. It actually arranges to have books attacking the Warren Commission published, but ones which are so poorly researched or written that they effectively discredit genuine critics by “the company they keep.”
It was a publicist at the Agency, decades ago, who came up with the derogatory term, "conspiracy theorist" to be used against genuine critics, and the term remains in wide use today.
America’s corporate press, always doggedly loyal to Deep State interests, keeps the term alive by regular use in articles and editorials still. Its longevity is proof of how effective such media manipulation can be.
American society is deeply penetrated by the CIA and its sister agencies, and it has been since long before the Snowden revelations about the NSA snooping on everyone.
The truth is that it was a terrible mistake to create something like CIA, and the very President who signed the legislation, Harry Truman, said so.
You simply cannot create a huge, well-financed agency whose accountability is close to non-existent, charge it with the execution of countless dirty tricks and manipulations abroad, allow its members to lie under oath, and keep financing its cancerous growth, without creating a monster, a monster which attacks decency in your society, destroys ethical considerations in your international dealings, and a monster which erodes the foundations of democratic government.