RESPONSE TO A COLUMN BY CHRISTOPHER BROOKER IN THE TELEGRAPH
A rubbishy playing with words, Mr. Booker.
Science cannot be a religion.
Science - true science, not the fraudsters on the edges - is a method.
It is a scrupulously defined method for establishing not truths - there are no "truths" in modern science - but as a way of understanding the way things work.
The method could take us anywhere, and the crucial characteristic of a scientific mind is that it is that it goes where the method leads.
Preconceptions have no role.
How can a method be a religion? Religion is nothing if it is not a set of tenets taken on faith as truth.
It cannot.