Thursday, July 26, 2012

REPORT PROSECUTORS MAY SEEK DEATH PENALTY IN COLORADO MASSACRE - IMAGINE MY SURPRISE? - WHY THE DEATH PENALTY IS CONSIDERED NO DETERRENT BY EXPERTS


POSTED RESPONSES TO A COLUMN IN TORONTO'S GLOBE AND MAIL

Gee, what a surprise.

In America?

The death penalty?

It just couldn't be clearer that the man is mentally ill.

Very likely he suffers from late-onset paranoid schizophrenia.

He belongs in an institution where he can do no harm.
___________________________________

All first-rate judges and lawyers know, from long experience, that the death penalty has no deterrent value whatever.

This goes back to a fundamental analysis of human behavior in part.

Heavy penalties are of far less deterrent value than is the certainty of being caught.

When you add in the fact that every single instance of murder involves a degree of mental instability - either serious mental illness or temporary blazing rage or even psychopathy in the case of "cold-blooded" killers - there is no argument for the death penalty ever, other than the Nazi-like one of just eliminating the unfit.

Legal experts know that the death penalty is horrifically costly with all the appeals and legal ploys. It costs a small fortune and years of wrangling to execute one convicted person. From that point of view alone, it makes no sense.