MORE MONEY WON’T FIX CBC
John Chuckman
I’ve heard leaders of both the Liberal Party and the NDP
promise more money for CBC should either of them be elected later this year. We
know CBC has suffered fairly severe cuts in funding from Stephen Harper’s bleak
government. But at the same time, something else has been happening for years at
CBC, and much of it has little to do with money. CBC relentlessly has dumbed
itself down, hiring hosts with little interesting knowledge or even effective
intelligence, muting and censoring the content of shows, and demonstrating,
again and again, its implicit rejection of what should be its mandate.
A national broadcaster can never compete directly with
commercial broadcasters. You don’t have to be an expert to understand that. A
national broadcaster only makes sense if it focuses on quality, as a showcase
for the nation’s talent, as an educator for children and the nation’s
immigrants about the political and cultural nature of a country, as a forum for
new ideas, and as a contributor to general understanding by others about what
Canada is.
CBC is failing miserably today on all fronts. I address
radio broadcasting since I am not someone who watches television, and besides
it is the radio service which long has enjoyed the superior reputation, but
that now has ceased to be the case. Much of what now is broadcast day-in,
day-out, both on Radio One and Radio Two, is simply a waste of airtime. Blubbering
about pop music for hours of every day, as CBC Radio has done now for years, is
about as far as you can run away from the responsibilities of a national
broadcaster.
Some once-excellent shows are decaying even as we listen. “The
Current,” for example, with Anna Maria Tremonti, one of most capable interviewers
Canada has ever produced, has her doing few incisive interviews, avoiding
topics, and substituting Oprah Winfrey-style fluff, as for example, a half hour
about plus-size women recently. I’m eagerly anticipating the “complete make-over”
show. Apart from the noticeable decline in political or cultural interviews, which
to my mind were the show’s raisons d'être, the now-usual Friday host and
temporary fill-in is a person (aka, future possible replacement in training) who
has neither the skill nor sharp intelligence to conduct an enjoyable,
hard-hitting interview.
Moreover, that fill-in host just happens to be the wife of a
senior newsman on the same station, raising once again the problem of nepotism and
favoritism which has long plagued the radio network.
The “Sunday Edition” with Michael Enright is a mere shadow
of itself, not only cut from three to two hours but filled with boring crap
like precious personal essays and documentaries from wannabe producers and
there is a noticeable limit on the worthiness of the people being interviewed. There
is a rather viciously quiet, persistent strain of bias on some topics, one
being the Middle East, injected regularly and without the least effort to
balance other views. Such news and current event shows have been drained of most
of their meaningful content.
The show, “As It Happens,” has been literally run into the
ground, its original premise of telephone interviews with an assortment of the
day’s newsmakers or eccentrics having become outdated by the timeliness of
events on the Internet. Anyone who spends a bit of time on a computer knows
those things before this show gets around to them today, yet the show desperately tries to hold on and
find a purpose with not-very-good interviews and even boring little panel
groups.
The National News and the regional news, coming out of
Toronto, border on embarrassing at times. Apart from the now-often poor grammar
of newsreaders, the content is just thin and uninformative. There is no
digging, there is no follow-up, and there is no judgment or concern
demonstrated over clearly unanswered questions. It comments on events in other
parts of the world today with no understanding and often considerable bias,
often sounding as though as though press releases from Washington were being
read. A truly Canadian viewpoint has just about disappeared. Reportage on other
stories throughout the country is often by very young women correspondents who
sound as though they just graduated from Ryerson, using the obviously-learned
gimmicks of journalism courses, always attempting to end with little
punch-lines, which are more often than not predictable and desperately
contrived.
The parade of not even second-rate musical talent jammed
into every available opening - everything from junky rap to knock-offs of soul
or 1960s stuff and a lot of silly girlie-sounding elevator music - has increased
steadily everywhere so that barely a few minutes pass before it starts up
again. I doubt one out of ten of these is worth broadcasting, making CBC sound
like what I imagine the old, fabled Ted Mack Radio Amateur Hour must have sounded
like. And besides, the main content of Radio One should be intelligent talk,
not music, much less starving-artist style pop music.
All of the classy, knowledgeable people on specialty shows –
from Bernard St Laurent to Bob McDonald or Eleanor Wachtel or Ed Lawrence – are
getting old, and one can only imagine with what teeny-bopper horrors they will
be replaced.
The show, “Ideas,” originally of some interest, now is
pretty much a tired, deflated balloon. There rarely is anything worthy of the
name idea making an appearance. The
show buys documentaries of remarkably little worth and broadcasts them with a
vapid voice-over by the host.
A complete lack of imagination and meaningful direction at
CBC has been running things into the ground for years. The management has only
one theme, come up with some pop stuff so that we’ll be popular, and of course
that’s questionable assumption as well as a dereliction of its duty as a
national broadcaster.
I think the hideous Jian Gomeshi saga nicely illustrates
what has happened, serving almost as an allegory, his dreary career closely
corresponding with the descent of CBC into meaninglessness. Apart from his
grotesque personal life, the man always was a walking mediocrity with almost nothing
he said worth hearing but with a lot of bad judgment and bad taste thrown in as
flavoring, yet because the show achieved some popularity – after all, if you
throw enough crap on a wall, there will always be people entertained by the act
- the man was allowed to run his show for years as a sadistic bully, supposed
CBC principles of humanity and fairness cast to the wind by all involved. No,
there’s far more in that dreary story than a man charged with rape and abuse of
women, there’s the mask of the CBC ripped off to reveal a whining, inadequate,
and timid management.
I simply do not see how handing over hundreds of millions of
additional public funds can change CBC for the better, given the people who are
entrenched there now and have made nothing but poor decisions for years.
