DONALD TRUMP IS ELECTABLE AS PRESIDENT, BUT…
John Chuckman
I think it entirely possible Donald Trump could be elected
President. I am not in favor of it - but then neither am I in favor of any of
the other candidates on offer - yet I do think his election is increasingly
possible. America displays every four years - almost like a temporary clothesline
erected on the front lawn of the White House loaded with soiled and tattered undergarments
- the sheer poverty of its political system. Every four years, a gang of mediocrities
and thugs spend vast amounts of money to say, from coast to coast, nothing
worth hearing.
Sometimes I wonder why anyone bothers to run for office in a
long, costly, and exhausting contest which if won means four years of taking
directions from the Pentagon and seventeen security agencies. America is not a
democracy, and the last president who actually tried to exert some significant
influence on affairs left much of the right side of his head in the streets of
Dallas. But ego is a mighty powerful motivator, and the gang engaged in
national American politics has plenty of it, even if few other redeeming
qualities.
Trump could make Hillary Clinton regret she ever shared a
stage to debate with him, especially a Hillary Clinton whose past has finally
begun to catch up with her, now finally wounded by her long record of dark
intrigues and vicious lies. Trump is no angel by comparison, but his focus has
been on making money and aggrandizing his name, things most Americans respect. He
has no political record for which to account or apologize.
He has said many things which make him sound like a juvenile
given to insulting people’s appearances, and he has some proposals which would
prove impossible for anyone to implement, yet somehow he has hit on some issues
which find a welcome hearing by many, especially unsophisticated people who
might even once have been Democratic voters. Americans are tired of
unresponsive politicians, something of which they have stables full. They are
also tired of the bewildering events in a world at the center of which
invariably the United States finds itself. Most Americans never voted for such
things and have no interest in them. Only dishonest appeals about supporting
the troops keep them from rebelling, and their own increasingly difficult
economic lives generate a lot of stress. America is full of frustrated and
angry people, many of them not even sure what it is they are so angry about and
many of whom have no time or patience to understand the world in which they
live. Hard-hitting simplicities are music to the ears.
One of the sharpest ironies of Trump is that not all of his
views are simplicities. Some are dead-on assessments of things which could have
been avoided and leaders who failed the country. So this man comes bundled with
a wide-ranging group of political goods, far more so than anyone I can recall
in recent times. Just think of the simple-minded recitals of senior American
politician after senior American politician. They all sound rather like Sarah
Palin reciting her money-generated mantra but with differing levels of sophistication
and vocabulary. She is the basic template while other models come with little
tweaks and feature, but they all say nothing worth hearing. There is a very
real reason for that: under America’s establishment-run, aristocratic political
system, there is almost zero latitude for change either in domestic or foreign
affairs, except in the field of war where more seems always welcome.
No matter what you think of Trump’s views - and the author
should confess he is not an admirer of most of them - many people find it
utterly refreshing to hear him touch subjects none of the usual Washington
politicians touch. He goes far beyond the pathetic high-school recitation of
lines by Sarah Palin. Or, I might add, the paid lies of men like Newt Gingrich
and scores of others who will literally speak in absurdities in return for
multi-million dollar campaign contributions. I only mention Newt because the
last time he tried to campaign, he ran around the country saying there really
was no such thing as a Palestinian, his quid pro quo for nearly twenty million
dollars in funds from a man with claustrophobic ties to Israel.
Just think of the all the bland, say-nothing-worth-hearing
types, epitomized by Jeb Bush who resembles nothing so much as a well-groomed
hamster both in the sounds he makes and in his blinking-into-the-camera,
insipid-smile looks. And think of all the grotesque liars who run for high
office in America never telling people what really motivates or enables them or
what special interests pay their way. It all really is a parody of democracy.
You might think a brash and independent-minded guy like
Trump is just the answer to changing some of that, and I can well understand
the hopes, but there are very powerful barriers in American society as it now has
come to be organized against such hopes being realized. The first day of
sitting at a huge polished conference table, greatly outnumbered by arrogant
country-club security chiefs with secret budgets you cannot imagine and rigid generals
whose uniforms glitter almost like Christmas trees, might just test the mettle
of a Trump. Add to that the heads of great corporations each worth hundreds of
billions of dollars making private appointments. And then the polished heads of
mighty special interest lobby groups used to getting their way. And just who
are your allies and confidants in opposing some of the things they demand? You
have no political background from which you would have built such relations.
It’s a daunting and dreary picture, and you have to remember,
these powerful people who compose the formidable American aristocracy are the
very ones who allowed and encouraged the ugly situations into which America is
straight-jacketed.
Despite Trump’s freshness and energy, a Trump victory could
prove a disaster. Not because he would flirt with atomic war, something Obama
now already does regularly, or create vast new domestic schemes. Of course, the
scheme of building a fence across Mexico and rounding up and returning all
illegal migrants is vast indeed – a virtual moon-landing project from scratch –
but this author thinks it would fortunately prove impossible. Even if the
American aristocracy permitted him to pursue such a Don Quixote project, it
would only be in order to gain his compliance in other, far more important and
consequential matters such the vast, destabilizing, and murderous wars in the
Middle East and the bullying of Russia and China.
On top of all that, Trump has made some deadly serious
enemies, and number one on the list is Israel and its supporters who view him
as not adequately friendly to Israel’s interests.
When Trump, for example, speaks, entirely sensibly, about
leaving Syria for Putin to sort out, he goes dead against a dark and costly
scheme which was in part created by Israel. They want Assad dead. They want
Syria Balkanized much as Iraq is. And they are enjoying the stolen,
discount-priced oil they get indirectly from ISIS through Turkey.
And they don't want Russia gaining genuine influence in the
Mideast, the United States being Israel’s source of seemingly inexhaustible
assistance, permission, and protection - the provider of vast subsidies of
every kind imaginable. Moreover, Netanyahu and other leaders in Israel have
long striven to have Israel assume a geopolitical role in the Mideast as a kind
of miniature replica of what the United States is in the world, a bully
hegemon. There’s no room in that picture for Russia.
If you read the kind of columnists who regularly serve as apologists
for Israel's brutality – there’s at least one filling that role on the staff of
every mainline newspaper - you find a universally negative attitude towards
Trump. It has nothing to do with conservatism versus liberalism, and it certainly
has nothing to do with human rights. The columnists use words about human
rights to make their view more palatable to the general population of readers
and to serve as a smokescreen for what it is with which they are really
defending.
After all, Israel’s Netanyahu is perhaps the world’s most
flagrant violator of human rights, holding about five million people completely
against their will with absolutely no rights or freedoms, periodically stealing
their homes and land, violating the sanctity of their religious places, and frequently
just killing large batches of them - always undoubtedly with an eye to making
them so miserable that they will pick up and leave. The people of Gaza are not even
allowed to import cement to repair Israel’s recent destruction of their homes
and institutions. I simply do not know of crueler circumstances in the world
completely tolerated by America’s aristocracy.
There have been several ugly outbursts recently, including one
from an executive of Colorado's American Civil Liberties Union who was yelling about
assassinating Trump voters, words I just could not believe when I first read
them.
But then in past years we have had extremist defenders of
Israel propose many horrible measures including one from an American lawyer who
proposed summarily killing the entire families of any Palestinian acting as a “terrorist,”
so the raving speech is not without precedent. The executive’s words
communicate the intense level of hate which simmers. I am sure this disturbed
man - since forced to quit - is not the only one with such thoughts bubbling
like sewerage through his mind.
Always admirers of political hamsters and gerbils as candidates
with dark eminences behind them doing the necessary filth, the Bush-Cheney
model if you will, or indeed the Eisenhower-Dulles or Reagan-Casey one - the
Republicans will make every effort to stop Trump with backstage political
manipulations, such as a brokered convention, but they may well not succeed,
his position being made quite strong by the possibility of his running as a
third-party candidate, and one with huge financial resources to boot.
But if they fail, and he wins, look out for the darkest
possibilities.
