COMMENT POSTED TO AN ARTICLE IN THE GUARDIAN
“...but some former
officials say the disgraced ex-president would be ‘absolutely disgusted’ by
Donald Trump."
Publishing that kind of vague generalization is simply not
journalism.
It's the stuff of gossip columns.
If Trump is so terrible as The Guardians editors are
convinced he is, then give readers some hard facts so they may make up their
minds.
But the very fact that you print, day after day, innuendos,
unwarranted generalizations, and just smears tells thoughtful readers you don't
have any factual basis for your dislike, just one of attitudes.
So how are you any different from what you keep accusing
Trump of?
You are not.
By the way, in a related matter of attitude over facts, we
have yet another shameful article today trying to associate the decent Jeremy
Corbyn with anti-Semitism.
An accusation of "Labour creating a safe space for vie
anti-Semitic attitudes." I put it to you that nothing is more vile than
just such accusations themselves and giving them substance by repeating them.
