COMMENT POSTED TO AN ARTICLE IN BREITBART
“YouTube Bans The
Daily Mail For ‘Violating Community Guidelines’”
You get exactly the same kind of thing from The Guardian
newspaper, these days one of the most biased and confused publications in the mainstream
press.
Critical comments - good solid ones, not abusive
name-calling - are very often deleted by an editor for being “against community
standards.”
The selection of articles upon which readers even are allowed
to comment is remarkably small, especially when you eliminate those along the
lines of, "How I learned to live with underarm hair" or
"Increasing numbers of women are giving bestiality a try."
The just plain news stories or editorials often allow no
comments, even when it's apparent to any objective reader they are twisted and
biased beyond endurance.
The Guardian goes on frequent rampages, too, like its long
genuinely McCarthyite campaign against Jeremy Corbyn over imagined
anti-Semitism in his party. It has been relentless and openly unfair and
produces never a scrap of proof, much resembling the approach of PM Theresa
May's recent accusations against Putin. And it pretty much totally threw in its
lot with May’s insupportable attacks on the head of a major state.
The paper, unrecognizable from its serious old format of
years ago, today resembles a hybrid cross of Millennials’ super-bounciness, an
advocacy publication for minorities of every description getting close at times
to excluding or abusing others, an establishment political house organ thinly
disguised as progressive, and one of Britain's more outrageous outlets for the
Israel Lobby – in other words, almost anything but a real newspaper with
journalistic standards.
