Thursday, March 15, 2018

JOHN CHUCKMAN COMMENT: NOT HARD TO SEE FAR MORE PLAUSIBLE EXPLANATIONS THAN THERESA MAY'S HYSTERICAL ACCUSATIONS OVER SPY-POISONING - A NUMBER OF STRONG CANDIDATES AS CULPRIT




COMMENT POSTED TO AN ARTICLE ON CBC NEWS


“Nerve agent in our midst is haunting, dangerous — and divisive
“Deterrence, investigation by independent watchdog crucial to defeat skeptics”

There is a national secret service whose motto is "By way of deception."

It is the same country which we know, as documented in a book just published, that has conducted 2,700 assassinations. 2,700 assassinations.

A grim toll indeed.

Now, it so happens that the same country has a very deep resentment over Russia's defense of Syria. Russia, in assisting an ally fighting genuine terror, has not only spoiled this other county’s dream of a smashed and broken Syria but disturbs its claims to an even larger slice of Syria than it already illegally holds.

An operation like this one in Salisbury is perfect for casting dark clouds over Russia and further marginalizing it in Europe. And who cares about an old ex-spy, a convicted felon, or any others, such as his daughter, who happened to be around? Certainly not an outfit that has conducted 2,700 assassinations.

The plans for Syria were for its government to be overthrown and the country to be broken into pieces, and a long time and a lot of resources were spent on trying to achieve that. As it happens, both Britain and the United States were partners in Syrian dirty work which also included Saudi Arabia and France.

This same country which has assassination as a minor industry also has nerve agents, and it could easily obtain samples of any it does not have. We know that to a certainty because in 1992, an El Al transport plane crashed near Amsterdam.

The clean-up was nasty indeed because the plane, against all of international flight rules, was carrying a big load of the chemical components for just such a nerve agent.

So, the nerve agent used in Britain certainly could have come from places other than Russia, including from Ukraine, which holds some supplies from its Soviet past. Ukraine was forced to give up its Soviet nuclear weapons after the fall of the USSR, but nothing prevented it from keeping nerve agents, which are widely viewed in the world as the poor man’s deterrent against neighboring states with nuclear weapons.

Of course, Ukraine itself could be responsible - its coup-installed government literally chokes with resentments towards Russia - but that government has proved so incompetent in all its military and economic moves – from causing its own provinces to secede over unjust laws to shooting down a civilian airliner and to putting their own economy into a tailspin - that one has some doubt in their ability to carry any scheme off. But supply material? Sure, gladly.

The likelihood of this or some other variation of events is far greater than May’s implausible assertion that a clever, highly-skilled chess player like Putin waited years to poison an old spy just before his own national election. And that he had it done in such a truly sloppy and suggestive way with signature chemicals?

After all, Russia's secret services also have or can obtain different nerve agents. They wouldn’t have to use a known Russian version. Suggesting that they did, much resembles the FBI’s past implausibly finding passports conveniently after a terrorist operation. The whole idea is almost ridiculous, but there's Theresa May pushing it for all she's worth.