Monday, February 12, 2018

JOHN CHUCKMAN COMMENT: ADVOCATING INTERNET CENSORSHIP IS ALWAYS DANGEROUS - AND OFTEN ADVOCATED BY PEOPLE YOU WOULD NOT TRUST TO ENTER THE FRONT DOOR OF YOUR HOME - REAL PROBLEMS LIKE FACEBOOK'S SMARMY ETHICS IGNORED



COMMENT POSTED TO AN ARTICLE BY JOHN NAUGHTON IN THE GUARDIAN


Theresa May thinks Facebook will police itself?
The PM has joined the social media ‘techlash’, but only new laws, not pious aspirations, will make a difference

"… and in particular the way they are allowing their users to pollute the public sphere with extremist rhetoric, hate speech, trolling and multipurpose abusiveness"

Very worrying statement for all those who embrace freedom of thought and expression.

"...pollute the public sphere..." sounds much like something from a Soviet Commissar or a Nazi Gauleiter.

No one in his right mind would trust someone like Theresa May or Tony Blair or the editor of this newspaper to police the internet.

In the matter of human freedom, it is always better to err on the side the internet giants now perhaps err on.

When it comes to Facebook, that most appalling of social media, the kind of stuff being talked of is the very least of its sins.

This is a genuinely controlling, high-handed, and almost police-state device by its very design and way of operating.

The way it treats all of its members and its dishonesty are what is most troubling, not the fact that it may contain this or that unacceptable postings by some reckonings.

But that doesn't bother the establishment. No, what bothers them is that there are people saying things with which they disagree.
______________________________

Response to a comment about people subjected to all the name-calling on sites:

Well, this very newspaper conducted a long campaign of unwarranted name-calling.