Saturday, April 07, 2018

JOHN CHUCKMAN COMMENT: SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE TERRIBLE CONCENTRATION OF WEALTH TAKING PLACE IN SOCIETIES AND AMERICA'S HYPER-AGGRESSIVE DRIVE FOR WORLD DOMINANCE





COMMENT POSTED TO AN ARTICLE BY THOMAS FRANK IN THE GUARDIAN


“Trump's enemy is not your friend: why we shouldn't defend Amazon
“Why must we choose between the worst president of our lifetimes and one of the most rapacious corporate enterprises in the country?”

All monopolies or near-monopolies or cancerously-large companies of any description are not your friends, no matter what kind of benign Big Brother expressions they wear. Or what kind of casual-looking outfits, such as grey tee-shirts, they are addicted to wearing.

That includes our much-concentrated corporate press and broadcasting and all of the Internet giants.

Lord Acton said it for all time in general terms for human society: "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."

A related concept is found in classical economic theory, which very much warns of the costs and hazards of monopolies and oligopolies.

But it requires an authority, a government willingness to act, in order to control this.

You see, to keep a free and competitive society, indeed, free and competitive, it requires regular oversight and corrective action.

Do you see anyone anywhere in the West ready to undertake that kind of activity?

The United States today is a driver of corporate gigantism. And if American corporations are gigantic and powerful, you can hardly expect governments in Britain or France or Germany to act in anti-monopoly or anti-concentration ways. They will not be able to compete internationally.

So, we are all fixed into a kind of vicious-cycle, travelling along on a clanking conveyor belt we have no control over which is taking us to I don’t know just where, but I am pretty sure it will come increasingly to resemble the Feudal structures of the 13th century.

America’s government contributes in more than one way, too. The Washington Establishment has set in writing for all to read the national goal of what is called "Full-spectrum dominance, everywhere."

If you have that kind of national goal on the military, economic, and diplomatic fronts, you are hardly going to start breaking up your gigantic firms of any description.

After all, their activities are part and parcel of your national goal.

Our future is not bright under such an international structure.

After all, we all recognize the dangers of dictatorship in a single place or country. How much greater is the risk of a dictator for the planet?

Internationally, one of the epic battles of history may well emerge over this matter. It really is that big and threatening.

So, any competition to America’s complete dominance in the world – even if from countries we do not regard as being as free as our own idea, or illusion, of our past - is in a sense an ally to us all in the struggle.